Fox News caught in the act

Fox News recently attempted to skew Ron Paul's second consecutive CPAC straw poll win by deceptively using footage from last year's CPAC event to represent the 2011 CPAC straw poll results. In last year's footage, Mitt Romney's supporters booed the poll result, which announced Ron Paul as the winner. Ron Paul's supporters were largely absent from the audience that day because of a Campaign for Liberty meeting running late.


So, Fox used the 2010 footage of a booing crowd, making it look like Ron Paul was getting booed again in 2011. They based their entire news "story" on the premise that Ron Paul got booed. When some people noticed what had happened, Fox News' defense was:

"During a live introduction of Congressman Ron Paul on Tuesday, America's Newsroom incorrectly aired a clip from the 2010 CPAC event in Washington rather than this year's event. It was clearly a mistake, we used the wrong video tape...It's an honest mistake. We apologize for the error. We look forward to having Representative Paul back on our program very soon."

As a well-known and professional news source, I find it incredibly difficult to believe that Fox couldn't distinguish between last year's footage and this year's. As I said, their entire news piece was based on Ron Paul getting booed, so they had to purposefully dig up the clip and create a story based off of it. Even small television stations have fact checkers and editors whose job it is to make sure mistakes like this don't happen.


This "mistake" would also be more plausible if Fox didn't already have a history of smearing and dismissing Paul and making him appear irrelevant and crazy. It seems they would much prefer for Paul to disappear. Here are a few examples:


- Fox News omitted Paul's name entirely from a survey last week that asked who would make the best president. Relative nobodies like John Thune and Jon Huntsman were included in the Fox poll, and yet Paul was blacklisted entirely despite his CPAC success two years running.


- During the 2008 presidential campaign, Fox news denigrated the fact that Ron Paul received the most campaign donations from members of the U.S. military by attributing it to "libertarian mailing lists"


- In January 2008, Fox excluded Paul from a presidential forum event, because they saw the prospect of anti-war opinions being voiced by the most conservative member of the House a "threat"


- In 2007, Fox News claimed their presidential poll, which Paul won, was unreliable because online Paul supporters had skewed the result, despite the fact that the survey was conducted via cell phone text messaging and no online votes were taken.


- Before the 2008 presidential campaign, Fox News was caught on several occasions editing Paul's name out of Associated Press news stories they syndicated. (For example, on Jan. 3, 2008 Fox News published an AP story with this line: "Only Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter have passed through since September." This is what the original AP story actually said: "Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson, Duncan Hunter and Ron Paul have passed through since September." Other news sources ran the same story, but Paul's name was only omitted in Fox's version.)

More dentists question fluoridation safety

Feds: Too much fluoride in water

By MIKE STOBBE/AP
In a remarkable turnabout, federal health officials say many Americans are now getting too much fluoride because of its presence not just in drinking water but in toothpaste, mouthwash and other products, and it's causing splotches on children's teeth and perhaps more serious problems.

Full story

The handy tracking device in your pocket

By ANDY COHEN / TIME

Smart phones do many things these days: surf the Internet, send e-mail, take photos and video (and — oh, yes — send and receive calls). But one thing they can do that phone companies don't advertise is spy on you. As long as you don't leave home without your phone, that handy gadget keeps a record of everywhere you go — a record the government can then get from your telephone company.

The law is unclear about how easy it should be for the government to get its hands on this locational data — which can reveal whether you've been going to church, attending a Tea Party rally, spending the night at a date's house or visiting a cancer-treatment center. A federal appeals court ruled last week that in some cases the government may need a search warrant. And while that's a step forward, it's not good enough. The rule should be that the government always needs a warrant to access your cell-phone records and obtain data about where you have been.

When you carry a cell phone, it is constantly sending signals about where you are. It "pings" nearby cell-phone towers about every seven seconds so it can be ready to make and receive calls. When it does, the phone is also telling the company that owns the towers where you are at that moment — data the company then stores away indefinitely. There is also a second kind of locational data that phone companies have, thanks to a GPS chip that is embedded in most smart phones now. This is even more accurate — unlike the towers, which can only pinpoint a general area where you may be, GPS can often reveal exactly where you are at any given moment within a matter of meters

...

It is not hard to imagine that the government could also one day use cell-phone data to stifle dissent. Cell-phone records could tell them who attended an antigovernment rally. It could also tell them who is going into the opposition party's headquarters or into the home of someone they have questions about. Cell-phone data may be the most efficient way ever invented for a government to spy on its people — since people are planting the devices on themselves and even paying the monthly bills. The KGB never had anything like it.

Full article here

Care for some 'Frankensalmon'?

Genetically modified salmon, which grows at a superfast rate, is safe to be farmed and eaten, American scientists have declared. 

The move by experts advising U.S. watchdogs will clear the way for the first GM creature to be sold as food.

The first GM salmon could be on American dinner tables within two to three years, and possibly on British plates soon after that, paving the way for the genetic modification of other fish and food animals into what critics are calling 'Frankenfood'.

Full story here

Farmers: Raw milk bans protect big industry

MARIE LANDAU / In These Times 

(Excerpts from article below; full story here)

Government, public health and dairy industry officials want to restrict the sale and distribution of raw (unpasteurized) milk, citing grave safety concerns. But small dairy farmers, organic consumers’ advocates and raw milk drinkers say the issue isn’t safety—it’s control of the dairy market.

In January, the Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources (MDAR) proposed new regulations that would ban off-the-farm sale and distribution of raw milk. Prior to making the revamped regulations public, MDAR issued cease-and-desist orders to four milk-buying clubs that buy raw milk directly from small farmers and distribute it among members.

Considering the relative safety of raw milk and its possible health benefits, campaigns against its legalization are surprisingly intense, and not just in Massachusetts.

David Gumpert, author ofThe Raw Milk Revolution, says that regulation is “not about safety—it’s about protecting markets.”

Click here for more

Government cracking down on nutritious food

Surveillance video appears to show officers from the Los Angeles District Attorney's office walking through Aajonus Vonderplanitz's Rawsome Foods with guns drawn. Image via LA Times

“If the people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.”  

                             -Thomas Jefferson

BY ABELLE787 / Empowered Citizens

Lately, the Web has been abuzz with reports of "raids" on health food stores. One such event occurred June 30 at Rawesome Foods in Venice, California. The crime? Selling raw milk. Armed federal, state and local authorities seized raw goat and cow milk and unpasteurized goat cheese, among other things.

Government regulators say they are just enforcing rules to protect consumers (despite that raw milk is nutritionally dense and has been consumed in its raw state for thousands of years) and give producers a level playing field. Store owners beg to differ.

"This is about control and profit, not our health," said Aajonus Vonderplanitz, co-founder of Rawesome Foods. "How can we not have the freedom to choose what we eat?"

Well,  I guess next authorities will start seizing cigarettes, alcohol and high fructose corn syrup. I know they'll do this, because the listed items are far more dangerous than unpasteurized milk. The government, Big Pharma and  Agribusiness just want us to be healthy. They have our best interests at heart, right?

Oh, wait...

See stories below:

Raw food highlights a hunger

Raids on the rise

George Carlin: Who really controls America

Controlling water

Here is a trailer to the new movie "Tapped"

Polish crash cameraman allegedly murdered

In the video footage,   four alleged gunshots can be heard   (Listen closely at the 1:07, 1:17, 1:23 and 1:26 marks).  After the first shot,   the cameraman says something to the effect of  "what the f***" as he appears to flee the crash site.   After more shots and shouts   (some say the Russian translation of the shouts are commands to shoot and later to pull out),  the cameraman repeats his earlier phrase,  and the video ends.

Here is the translation of the story from a Polish Web site:

"Author of the video seen by everyone by now has been stabbed near Kijow on 4.15 and transported in critical condition to the hospital in Kijow. On 4.16 three unidentified individuals unplugged him from life support system and stabbed him three more times. Andrij was pronounced dead that afternoon. Russian government claims it was a coincidence." 

Whether this is true or not, I believe it deserves the benefit of a doubt. The plane was filled with important Polish heads of state (including the president), bankers and parliament members, who were on their way to commemorate the 70th anniversary of a World War II massacre of 22,000 Polish officers. The murders were covered up for a long time. Here is a CNN piece that elaborates on this.

China's view of the Toyota recalls

Here is part of an article translated from Chinese:

YU FENGHUI (余丰慧) / Xinhua Net
Translated By Jake Curtis

After the Toyota issue broke out, the U.S. government played a major role in the auto recall. Public opinion shows that the U.S. is deliberately making a show of power by pressuring Toyota and seeking to promote its domestic automakers following the financial crisis. However, the U.S. is using its national power to fight the mighty Toyota and protect its own consumers. Globally, Toyota recalled an estimated 8.5 million cars, of which 6 million, or 70 percent of the total amount recalled, were in the United States. Aside from Toyota’s high sales in the U.S., the U.S. government’s harsh attack has little to do with the recall.

For the full translated story, click here
For the original story in Chinese, click here

Drugging our babies - a disturbing trend

EVELYN PRINGLE / Natural News

The United States has become the psychiatric drugging capital of the world for kids with children being medicated at a younger and younger age. Medicaid records in some states show infants less than a year old on drugs for mental disorders.

The use of powerful antipsychotics with privately insured children, aged 2 through 5 in the US, doubled between 1999 and 2007, according to a study of data on more than one million children with private health insurance in the January, 2010, "Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry."

The number of children in this age group diagnosed with bipolar disorder also doubled over the last decade, Reuters reported.

Of antipsychotic-treated children in the 2007 study sample, the most common diagnoses were pervasive developmental disorder or mental retardation (28.2%), ADHD (23.7%), and disruptive behavior disorder (12.9%).

The study reported that fewer than half of drug treated children received a mental health assessment (40.8%), a psychotherapy visit (41.4%), or a visit with a psychiatrist (42.6%) during the year of antipsychotic use.

"Antipsychotics, which are being widely and irresponsibly prescribed for American children--mostly as chemical restraints--are shown to be causing irreparable harm," warned Vera Hassner Sharav, president of the Alliance for Human Research Protection, in a February 26, 2010 InfoMail.

"These drugs have measurable severe hazardous effects on vital biological systems, including: cardiovascular adverse effects that result in shortening lives; metabolic adverse effects that induce diabetes and the metabolic syndrome," she wrote. "Long-term use of antipsychotics has been shown to result in metabolic syndrome in 40% to 50% of patients."

The lead researcher on the study above, Columbia University psychiatry professor Mark Olfson, told Reuters that about 1.5% of all privately insured children between the ages of 2 and 5, or one in 70, received some type of psychiatric drug in 2007, be it an antipsychotic, a mood stabilizer, a stimulant or an antidepressant.

Psychiatric drugs bathe the brains of growing children with agents that threaten the normal development of the brain, according to Dr Peter Breggin, founder of the International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology (ICSPP), and author of about 20 books, including "Medication Madness."

The drugs themselves are causing severe disorders in millions of children in the US, he warns. "Substances like antidepressants, stimulants, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotic drugs cause severe, and potentially permanent, biochemical imbalances."


Click here for the full story

Are you comfortable with this?

Once upon a time, the purpose of conducting the U.S. census was to apportion the members of the House of Representatives. Once upon a time, all you had to do was report how many people were living in your household. Why does the government now need to know, among other things, how many times a day you go to the bathroom?

Time to stock up on incandescent bulbs?

Congress has passed a law that says all incandescent light bulbs must be phased out by 2014, replaced by CFL (compact fluorescent) bulbs. What we're seldom told is that CFL bulbs pose serious health dangers. The bulbs contain mercury, one of Earth's most toxic elements. Most CFL bulbs contain four to five milligrams of mercury. That's enough to contaminate 6,000 gallons of clean water. 

These so-called "green" bulbs already occupy landfills around the nation, the mercury seeping into ground water. Where garbage is burned, the toxic element is released into the air we breathe. As time goes on and incandescents are eliminated, the problem will only grow more serious.

If a CFL bulb shatters, you can forget the days of sweeping up the shards with a broom and tossing them in the trash. Rather, you should treat the broken glass as you would a shattered thermometer. The EPA advises opening a window, evacuating the building for 15 minutes, then returning with duct tape to pick up the broken glass. After this, one is to put the glass shards and duct tape into a glass jar, screw on a tight lid and take it to a toxic dump. I have a feeling most American households won't be going this route.

This specific disposal information is not widely known, as CFL bulb packages don't list these steps. So, how are Americans supposed to know about the dangers of CFLs and about the proper disposal procedures? The media, maybe? It's a rare occurrence that the media pay this issue any attention. Here is a clip of one such rare occurrence:

Papers, please

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a spending bill last week that contains provisions to establish a biometric national ID card. The Senate may approve the measure in the next few days. The ID card is supposed to crack down on illegal immigration. The card will contain embedded information, such as fingerprints. It may also contain a tracking chip.

LAURA MECKLER / Wall Street Journal

Lawmakers working to craft a new comprehensive immigration bill have settled on a way to prevent employers from hiring illegal immigrants: a national biometric identification card all American workers would eventually be required to obtain.

Under the potentially controversial plan still taking shape in the Senate, all legal U.S. workers, including citizens and immigrants, would be issued an ID card with embedded information, such as fingerprints, to tie the card to the worker.

Click here for the full story.